Audio Note VINDICATOR Instrukcja Użytkownika

Przeglądaj online lub pobierz Instrukcja Użytkownika dla Wzmacniacze audio Audio Note VINDICATOR. Acceptance Testing for Digital Land Mobile Radio Systems Instrukcja obsługi

  • Pobierz
  • Dodaj do moich podręczników
  • Drukuj
  • Strona
    / 49
  • Spis treści
  • BOOKMARKI
  • Oceniono. / 5. Na podstawie oceny klientów
Przeglądanie stron 0
Acceptance Testing for Digital
Land Mobile Radio Systems
Presented by:
Jay Jacobsmeyer, P.E.
Pericle Communications Company
Karl Reardon, P.Eng.
Planetworks Consulting
IWCE 2010 - W07 Acceptance Testing
Przeglądanie stron 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 48 49

Podsumowanie treści

Strona 1 - Land Mobile Radio Systems

Acceptance Testing for DigitalLand Mobile Radio SystemsPresented by:Jay Jacobsmeyer, P.E.Pericle Communications [email protected] Rea

Strona 3 - They Put Software In It”

RF Coverage Performance RF Fundamentals Still Apply to Digital– Mean C/(I+N) in fading must still achieve minimum level But Digital Introduces New E

Strona 4 - Acceptance Test Elements

Characteristics of the Signal Multipath Fading Dominates the Mobile Radio Channel– Fade rate is a function of the doppler frequency, V/λλλλ– E.g., fo

Strona 5 - RF Coverage Testing

Rayleigh Fading(V = 30 mph, f = 850 MHz)-40-30-20-10010Amplitude normalized to mean, dB0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30Time in seconds

Strona 6 - Breakdown

Multipath Delay Spread Simulcast Networks Aside, the Signal at the Antenna is ReallyMultiple Reflected Signals with Random Delays– Extent of problem

Strona 7 - ATP Implications

Coverage Test Prerequisites Complete All Radio Site Acceptance Tests– Including site noise, desense, and intermod tests Verify Backhaul Network Rout

Strona 8 - Multi-Level Modulation

What to Measure?RSS = Received signal strengthBER = Bit error rateFER = Frame error rate (= block error rate)DAQ = Digital audio qualityClosest to Use

Strona 9

•Method •Pros •Cons•Signal Level •+ Test can be automated•+ Specialized test equipment not req’d•+ Aligns well with coverage prediction•- Does not co

Strona 11 - RF Coverage Performance

Signal Strength Signal Strength to be Measured in All Cases– Adequate C/N is necessary, but not sufficient condition– Measured simultaneously with ot

Strona 12 - Characteristics of the Signal

So What’s New with Digital?Many more systems, software, and technology between the user and their expectationsUsers who expect the “same performance …

Strona 13 - Rayleigh Fading

Bit Error Rate Testing(Or Frame Error Rate Testing)Q Remove RF Channel from Service and Place in Test Mode– May be problematic for busy, operational s

Strona 14 - Multipath Delay Spread

Voice Quality Testing1. Select and Use an Exclusive Talkgroup2. Automated Voice Play and Recording Preferred– Duration consistent with a typical voice

Strona 15 - Coverage Test Prerequisites

DAQ & MOS DefinitionsExcellent.Impairmentsimperceptible.MOS 5Speech easily understood. Occasionalnoise/distortion.DAQ 4.0Good.Impairmentsperceptib

Strona 16 - What to Measure?

Scoring Methods Even With Training, Some Variance Occurs One Method that Works:– Decide on passing threshold (E.g., DAQ = 3.4)– Pick three scorers:»

Strona 17

PESQ Problem: Manual Scoring is Labor-Intensive– Training is required– Variability of scores is tough to eliminate Possible Solution = PESQ– Percep

Strona 18

Audio File Samples

Strona 23 - Scoring Methods

“Radio Was Fun UntilThey Put Software In It”- Anonymous

Strona 26 - Sample 1

Pass/Fail CriteriaAnd Use of Statistics

Strona 27

Estimate for SAR(Service Area Reliability)SARTTwhereT is the number of tiles passedT is the total number of tilesptpt(%) % = 100

Strona 28 - Sample 2

Minimum Number of Samplesofnzp pd=−α/()2221Where p is the value of the SAR, zα/2 is the argument of theunit normal distribution for a confidence of 1-

Strona 29

Arguments of Unit Normal2.581.961.64Zαααα/21.6495%99%90%Confidence Level2.331.28Zαααα

Strona 30 - Sample 3

Example(d = .02, p = 95%)ConfidenceWindow TestGreaterThan Test788456321n643321195n2.581.961.64Zαααα/21.6495%99%90%ConfidenceLevel2.331.28ZααααGreater

Strona 31

Some Purchasing Pitfalls Pitfall #1 - Failure to Specify Measurable Performance Standards Pitfall #2 - Failure to Specify Standards that Measure Dig

Strona 32 - And Use of Statistics

Summary An Acceptance Test Plan Must– Use measurable standards,– Specify precisely how each standard is to be measured,– Include the statistical test

Strona 33 - Estimate for SAR

Other Acceptance TestElements

Strona 34 - Minimum Number of Samples

Acceptance Test Elements RF Coverage System Capacity Reliability Resiliency /Fault Recovery Features and Functionality Management and Administra

Strona 35 - Arguments of Unit Normal

System Capacity System Capacity Goes Beyond the Radio Link Capacity Often Difficult to Measure Directly– Sheer volume of messages– Unavailability of

Strona 36 - (d = .02, p = 95%)

System Capacity Specs.1. Define the Voice and Data Usage Models– Use busy hour traffic estimates– Consider fault / system recovery message loads– Watc

Strona 37 - Some Purchasing Pitfalls

System Capacity Testing Distribute Between Factory and System Acceptance Tests Use Commercial Network Test Tools to Stress BackhaulComponents Use D

Strona 38 - An Acceptance Test Plan Must

System Reliability/ Resiliency Consider Interaction Between All Systems– Momentary packet loss in one subsystem can cause lengthyreset in another– Id

Strona 39 - Elements

Features and Functionality Centralized Conformance Testing for OpenStandards Assists With This Area However, Conformance Tests Still Not at StageWhe

Strona 40 - System Capacity

Management & Administration Consider Information You Require to Support andManage the Network– Channel, site, link and system traffic, loading an

Strona 41 - System Capacity Specs

Final ThoughtThe view is nice but you really should only have to go out once.

Strona 42 - System Capacity Testing

Q&AEarly Land Mobile Radio - 1924Source: Bell Labs, http://www.bell-labs.com/history/75/gallery.html

Strona 43 - Failure Modes

References[1] W.C.Y. Lee, Mobile Communications Design Fundamentals, 2nd Ed.,Wiley, 1993.[2] W.C.Y. Lee, “Estimate of Local Average Power of a Mobil

Strona 44 - Features and Functionality

Points of ContactJay M. Jacobsmeyer, P.E.Pericle Communications Company1910 Vindicator Drive, Suite 100Colorado Springs, CO 80919(719) 548-1040Fax: (

Strona 46 - Final Thought

Vocoder IMBE™ by DVSI is the P25 Vocoder– Model-based like virtually all vocoders Optimized for Low Bit Rate Apps (< 4.8 kbps) Breakdown– 20 ms

Strona 47

ATP Implications Four Choices for Each Vocoder Frame– Accept frame (even if some errors detected)– Repeat frame– Adaptively smooth (interpolate) fram

Strona 48 - References

Multi-Level Modulation C4FM is a Form of 4-ary FSK 2 Bits per Symbol, Four Possible Carriersfc11 10 00 011.2 kHz

Strona 49 - Points of Contact

ATP Implications Modulation Fidelity is an Option for Testing Can Be Alternative to BER– Is a measure of eye closure– Does not require taking a chan

Komentarze do niniejszej Instrukcji

Brak uwag